Quote:
Originally Posted by dave2u
a question at 1.20pm about guides then a answer at 1.28pm with an add for a guide a Coincidence or am getting a little cynical
|
It's not the first time that a new thread I've started has received a near instant reply, but it's most likely to be from one of the regular "post watchers".
This post was promted by a personal mailshot e-mail to me with the sample inaccurate information shown.
This level of inaccuracy is very common I'm afraid, and I can see why someone with a direct interest decided to respond.
But it is simply a matter of timing that the "interested" party was on-line at the time I posted.
What will be very intersting is how good any new "informed by this forum" guide will be.
On a technical point - the signature of all of us "interested" parties is by definition an advert on EVERY post we make - it just happens that this one was very specific - as I'm sure you've noticed my new threads always raise interesting "issues".
..